Gahaha !!! Are you a robot??? seems like you guys get so dumb-founded as to how to discredit Ed Chiarini. That eventually you try and do the closest thing to addressing his work, and that is, to try to use his own premise against him. If you trolls would just talk to the man like a normal person. Then I'm sure it would not be too long before you and Ed had a normal, respectful conversation. Of course you never try to put yourselves in hid shoes and see other random people from his perspective. I'm impressed so far, in my personal connection and friendship with Ed, why? Because its obvious that your talking BS! At this stage you are not like us and we notice it in the way your brain processes thoughts. It's impossible for you to fool us, because we know in our hearts that Ed is another decent human being, a common man just like me. We are honored to be apart of our common human struggle and we are most certainly honored to be wellaware!!! P.s It is quite funny that, for me personally, the way in which people like yourself try to expose Ed Chiarini, is a way that does not relate to an honest and common human being. No matter how hard you try, you will never thin like us, therefore your little game is up. You have become so far from what we are, that all of you now, stand out like a dirty, filthy puss ridden disease. So please, continue you expose! you only help us to make the others wellaware. Or you can take a good hard look at yourself, let go of your inability to empathize and choose to become a member of our family again. We are always allowing the door to be open for the late comers :)
Dear Ed, Joshua and Cass. Thank you for correcting me and showing me that the material I presented in the original version of my article was being full of factual errors. It was certainly idiotic of me not to have corrected the article by eliminating the factual errors earlier.
I was using this as a blog to enhance contex creation skills. One of a few blogs I keep. When I found out about the factual errors in this article of mine I tried to correct as many as possible.
Idiot
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGahaha !!! Are you a robot???
ReplyDeleteseems like you guys get so dumb-founded as to how to discredit Ed Chiarini. That eventually you try and do the closest thing to addressing his work, and that is, to try to use his own premise against him. If you trolls would just talk to the man like a normal person. Then I'm sure it would not be too long before you and Ed had a normal, respectful conversation. Of course you never try to put yourselves in hid shoes and see other random people from his perspective. I'm impressed so far, in my personal connection and friendship with Ed, why? Because its obvious that your talking BS! At this stage you are not like us and we notice it in the way your brain processes thoughts. It's impossible for you to fool us, because we know in our hearts that Ed is another decent human being, a common man just like me. We are honored to be apart of our common human struggle and we are most certainly honored to be wellaware!!!
P.s It is quite funny that, for me personally, the way in which people like yourself try to expose Ed Chiarini, is a way that does not relate to an honest and common human being. No matter how hard you try, you will never thin like us, therefore your little game is up. You have become so far from what we are, that all of you now, stand out like a dirty, filthy puss ridden disease. So please, continue you expose! you only help us to make the others wellaware. Or you can take a good hard look at yourself, let go of your inability to empathize and choose to become a member of our family again. We are always allowing the door to be open for the late comers :)
Who are you? Hmm. I can't find myself on Wikipedia so I guess I must not exist...LAME
ReplyDeleteDear Ed, Joshua and Cass. Thank you for correcting me and showing me that the material I presented in the original version of my article was being full of factual errors. It was certainly idiotic of me not to have corrected the article by eliminating the factual errors earlier.
ReplyDeleteBest wishes....
Cass just one of those online bloggers out there.
ReplyDeleteDear Cass M
ReplyDeleteI was using this as a blog to enhance contex creation skills. One of a few blogs I keep. When I found out about the factual errors in this article of mine I tried to correct as many as possible.